Top-up vs full pay: what’s right for your parental leave policy?

When reviewing your parental leave policy, one of the biggest decisions is how to support primary carers financially. Should your organisation:

  • Top up government-paid parental leave (PPL) by paying the difference between PPL and the employee’s salary?

  • Or provide full pay, covering an employee’s full salary, regardless of PPL?

We break down the key considerations, employer trends, and real examples to help you find the best fit for your people and your budget.


What are other NZ employers doing?

According to Crayon’s 2024 Parental Leave Trends report, among employers offering paid leave:

  • 54% offer top-ups

  • 41% offer full pay

  • 5% use another approach

This data, drawn from the NZ Parental Leave Register, can be a valuable benchmark to support internal discussions with leadership or your board.

Key considerations when choosing between top-up and full pay

Budget: What’s more cost-effective?

Full pay generally costs more for two reasons:

  • You’re paying the full salary in addition to PPL

  • Uptake is higher—particularly among partners and fathers—because it’s easier to access

Top-up tends to reduce total spend but can be less flexible and inclusive.

 

International consistency: Do you operate in multiple countries?

If you’re an employer with operations in more than one country, full pay is often easier to standardise across different jurisdictions, whereas top-ups depend on local government schemes.

 

Equal pay: Are you aiming for a gender-equal policy?

Companies with equal-paid parental leave (same benefits for all parents, regardless of gender or carer role) often choose full pay. It supports inclusion, equity, and consistency, especially for non-birthing or same-sex parents.

 

Flexibility: How much control do you need?

Full pay offers more freedom because, as the employer, you set the eligibility and how leave is used.

Top-ups are tied to New Zealand’s government-paid leave rules, which are prescriptive.

Real examples: Making top-ups more flexible

More employers are modifying traditional top-up policies to provide more flexibility. Here are two examples:

 

Example #1: Broadening eligibility

Buddle Findlay offers top-ups from day one of employment. If an employee doesn’t qualify for PPL (e.g. a father taking on the primary carer role after the first 6 months), they still receive their full salary.

 

Example 2: Giving primary carers a choice

Simpson Grierson lets primary carers choose between:

  • 26 weeks of top-up, or

  • 12 weeks of full pay (if becoming the primary carer after PPL ends)

This hybrid approach supports a range of family situations and leave timelines.

 

Find the right fit for your business

Not sure which approach works best for your team or your budget?

Crayon’s free Top-Up vs Full Pay Comparison Tool helps you model the cost and value of each option based on your real salary data and leave structure.


Now for the important legal part: The information we provide is general and not regulated financial advice for the purposes of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013. Please seek independent legal, financial, tax or other advice in considering whether the content in this article is appropriate for your goals, situation or needs. The information in this article is current as at 16 May 2025.


Stephanie Pow

Founder & CEO of Crayon

 

Related articles

Summary Block
This block has no content yet. Items you add to the page connected to this block will display here.
Previous
Previous

Communicating with employees on parental leave: A guide to keeping-in-touch hours

Next
Next

The surprising way parental leave affects your annual leave